Lincoln-Douglas
The value syllogism. Comparison under pressure. Categorical truths defended in five minutes. LD sharpens impact calculus and comparison.
Hard reset. Every student leaves able to construct debate from the ground up — not parroting templates, but understanding the underlying logic that generates every technique they will ever use.
When students come to the same conclusions we come to, independently, we have done our job.
The structure below is modeled after the Ethos PHC camp format: discrete one-hour lectures, each with a clear thesis, followed by drills or practice application. Days run approximately 6–7 hours with a lunch break and built-in game / decompression blocks. The goal is intensity without burnout — students should leave each day tired but not fried.
Two tracks: Team Policy (TP) and Lincoln-Douglas (LD). No varsity / novice split. Hard reset.
Option A is the full camp. Four days, the whole roadmap, multiple practice rounds, track splits, delivery day. Option B compresses the core into a single session.
The whole roadmap. Architecture, rebuttal, resolution analysis, delivery. Multiple judged rounds with written feedback.
The core, compressed. One intensive session. A taste of the standard before a roster commits to the full cycle.
Two axes: causality and time. The grid below is the master plan. Once a student can place any argument on it, technique becomes a question of application.
Fact debate lives in present cause only. Value debate lives in present and future effects. Policy debate lives in all four.
Both teach the same underlying logic. Mornings are shared.
The value syllogism. Comparison under pressure. Categorical truths defended in five minutes. LD sharpens impact calculus and comparison.
Stock issues. Warrant depth. Specific affirmatives stress-tested across the round. TP sharpens warrant depth and structure.
Targeted exercises that build the parts. Each one names a specific failure mode and reps it out.
Defend any position for one minute, no notes. Fastest way to find what you actually believe.
Build a case in three sentences. If it does not fit on a napkin it is not yet a case.
Cross-examined in series until the weak link surfaces. You learn it before the other team does.
Two students, one resolution, opposite frameworks. Whoever owns the standard wins the round.
Magnitude × probability, on the clock. Until comparative weighing is muscle memory.
The one test that matters: can you place any argument on the grid?
Honest answers to the obvious ones. Send the rest through the form below.
Tell us who, when, and how many. We confirm dates and scope personally, then share payment details.